1. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 25m

   The judge granted the motion because he did not believe a buccal swab would be an "unreasonable intrusion." Case law backed the motion up.

   Expand

   • Reply
   • Retweeted
   • Favorite
2. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 26m

   The defense argued that it was a bit premature because we're still awaiting results of a forensic exam to determine Dhondt's competency.

   Expand
3. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 26m

   I have better internet now. Not much more to share about today's proceeding. The prosecution sought the saliva to compare with DNA samples.

   Expand
4. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 55m

   The motion, filed by the prosecution, was seeking a mouth swab for DNA from Dhondt. It has been granted.

   Expand
5. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 1h

   William Dhondt has entered the courtroom.

   Expand
6. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 1h

   I would've shortened that link, but again, rough internet. Attorneys for both sides are here so we should be underway soon.

   Expand
7. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 1h

   Here's my earlier story about this case: http://theoaklandpress.com/articles/2013/02/27/news/cops_and_courts/doc512d1aee8f526273592089.txt …

   Expand
8. Dave Phillips ‏@dave_phillips1 1h

   I'm in court awaiting motion hearing for William Dhondt, accused of dismembering his girlfriend. Internet is shaky here but I'll do my best.